| | As the End of the Year Approaches, Here's Straight Talk on Imaging Software Decisions | |
| | By David Guilbault, Director, Customer and ISV Development, ImageTagRead this article at MSDynamicsWorld.com The end of the year brings with it a number of budget-related decisions at many companies. So I thought I'd try to answer the typical questions we get from clients and prospects. Okay, I have some year-end capital - can I really implement an imaging system this year (and see real benefits in 2010)? In a word: YES. In fact this could be my shortest article yet. Go forth and spend that money! (However, as a matter of full disclosure, since I'm with a document imaging vendor, you should take my exuberance with a grain of salt.) Seriously, if you have funds and are looking for a good place to spend them, document imaging as an added investment to your Microsoft Dynamics environment can deliver results almost immediately. Here are four quick examples:
Okay, I get it. But is there enough time to buy and implement a system before the end of the year? Yes. Modern imaging systems are much less of a systems integration project than in earlier years. Look for the distributed solutions that leverage your digital copier infrastructure and embed within your Microsoft Dynamics ERP client software. This enables users to continue to do what they do today without learning new scanning equipment, software or processes. Focus on solutions that you can imagine your users adopting. The benefits to your organization won't occur unless your workers actually use the solution. If you can't see this in the first product demonstration, move on. You gave me a checklist a few months ago to use when shopping for an imaging solution for my Microsoft Dynamics environment. What were they again? I outlined ten criteria that act as guidelines to insure that your requirements are defined during the buying process.
I have some money, not unlimited funds. How much will I have to spend? Distributed solutions leverage a lot of what you already own. This advantage translates into a lower entry cost for imaging than a few years ago. Almost all solutions count users, so you have to as well in order to estimate a price. The focus of the examples in my articles has been the payables process simply because of the high percentage of the documents arriving in paper form. But don't forget your sales order process when determining the number of users you'll need. You can expect to pay $7-$8K for a three-user system from the leading vendors in this category. Ten users will likely drive up that price by two-to-three times. This amount usually represents the software portion although some vendors actually supply server hardware in the package. When they don't, remember that image processing is CPU-intensive so most vendors will want a dedicated server so be sure to take that into account. Support and maintenance is required and is most often calculated based upon the cost of the system. Rates range from 18 to 22%. Services to implement the solution round out the investment. Be sure to ask for a firm figure on this portion of quote. Your vendor should be able to define the tasks required to get you going ahead of time rather than a pay-as-you-go approach. You've discussed buying a distributed solution. I've read your articles and I need a centralized solution to meet my needs. Centralized solutions in general take longer to implement because they strive to automate some (or all) of the paper processing. If you have an existing scanning department in your organization, you are in good position to get started. One tip: put off some measure of the automation until phase two. Getting your documents digital will likely provide the most immediate return, i.e. access, compliance and recovery. Will I get a good deal if I buy now? Many software companies run their operations on a calendar year basis. This provides your company with a great opportunity for savings because there are good deals out there. And you would be surprised how responsive software vendors are at this time of year. About the Author: | |
| |